Out Now
The Resources Issue
Current Issue
The Resources Issue
Feb-Mar 2025
We all know that LED lights are more environmentally friendly than their money-burning, chemical-leaking predecessors. But as is often the case with eco-wisdom, the entire story is a little more complicated.
We all know that LED lights are more environmentally friendly than their money-burning, chemical-leaking predecessors.
But as is often the case with eco-wisdom, the entire story is a little more complicated.
While there’s no denying the positives far outweigh the negatives, is there a darker side to the squeaky-clean image of the light-emitting diode?
Here’s a look at the facts — a strictly ‘no greenwashing’ zone.
Eco truth: LED light fittings still go into landfill, and they will not biodegrade (see boxout). But they do leave a much smaller footprint.
That’s largely because LED lights have a significantly longer life span, so there aren’t as many of them heading for the tip. It is acceptable to dispose of LED lights in a regular (red) bin, but they can also be recycled in the same way as other lighting waste, whereby the non-renewable materials such as glass and aluminium can be recovered and reused.
LEDs do need to be discarded correctly, however, so you can’t just put them in a home recycling bin.
Check with your local council to see if they have specific recycling facilities and where to drop them off.
Eco truth: How much electricity is consumed depends on the individual device and the lighting fixture design. But yes, LEDs use way less energy — at least 75 per cent less than the old household light bulbs.
An example: fluorescent strip lights convert only around five per cent of the energy they use into light and the remaining 95 per cent goes into heat. LED lights have these figures the other way around.
Eco truth: Mercury is an extremely toxic heavy metal, and a key component of fluorescent, CFL, ultraviolet and neon globes. Electricity zaps the mercury vapour, triggering a reaction that creates light. (Some HID bulbs also contain radioactive substances such as Krypton-85 and thorium.)
Each CFL contains about five milligrams of mercury, which isn’t much, but it can still be dangerous. If inhaled or absorbed through the skin, mercury damages the central nervous system.
When CFLs are punctured or crushed in the disposal process, the chemicals can leach into surrounding soil and waterways and poison fish and other wildlife. LED lights contain no mercury.
They do contain nickel, lead and trace amounts of arsenic though, so always best to recycle where possible (see Green claim #1).
Eco truth: The trouble with how popular LEDs have become is that we’re using lighting more than ever — and especially at night.
Light pollution has increased worldwide in the past decade and the prevalence of energy-saving LED lights must shoulder some of the blame for this.
A report in the respected scientific journal Science Advances found that artificially lit outdoor surfaces are growing at a rate of 2.2 per cent every year. Light pollution (particularly from blue LEDs) affects nocturnal animals, plants and micro-organisms and is increasingly suspected of being harmful to human health due to its impact on the sleep hormone melatonin.
Eco truth: This is simply not the case. In fact, people often forget where the light bulbs are at their local Gemcell branch by the time they need to replace them. Please don’t be shy about asking your friendly retailer for help.
Keep up to date with our latest news and competitions by subscribing to our regular newsletter.
Issue 184
DEC 24 - JAN 25
Issue 183
OCT - NOV 2024
Issue 182
AUG - SEPT 2024
Issue 181
JUN - JUL 2024
Issue 180
APR - MAY 2024
Issue 179
FEB - MARCH 2024
Issue 178
DEC 2023 - JAN 2024
Issue 177
OCT - NOV 2023
Issue 176
AUG - SEPT 2023
Issue 175
JUN - JUL 2023
Issue 174
APR - MAY 2023
Issue 173
FEB - MAR 2023
Issue 172
DEC 2022 - JAN 2023
Issue 171
OCT - NOV 2022
Issue 170
AUG - SEPT 2022
Issue 169
JUN - JUL 2022
Issue 168
APR - MAY 2022
Issue 167
FEB - MAR 2022
Issue 166
DEC 2021 - JAN 2022
Issue 165
OCT - NOV 2021
Issue 164
AUG - SEPT 2021
Issue 163
JUN - JUL 2021
Issue 162
APR - MAY 2021
Issue 161
FEB - MAR 2021
Issue 160
DEC 2020 - JAN 2021
Issue 159
OCT - NOV 2020
Issue 158
AUG - SEPT 2020
Issue 157
JUN - JUL 2022
Issue 156
APR - MAY 2020
Issue 155
FEB - MAR 2020
Issue 154
DEC 2019 - JAN 2020
Issue 153
OCT - NOV 2019
Issue 152
AUG - SEPT 2019
Issue 151
JUN - JUL 2019
Issue 150
APR - MAY 2019
Issue 149
FEB - MAR 2019
Issue 148
DEC 2018 - JAN 2019
Issue 147
OCT - NOV 2018
Issue 146
AUG - SEPT 2018
Issue 145
JUN - JUL 2018
Issue 144
APR - MAY 2018
Issue 143
FEB - MAR 2018
Issue 142
DEC 2016 - JAN 2017
Issue 141
OCT- NOV 2017
Issue 140
AUG - SEPT 2017
Issue 139
JUN - JUL 2017
Issue 138
APR - MAY 2017
Issue 137
FEB - MAR 2017
Issue 136
DEC 2016 - JAN 2017
Issue 135
OCT - NOV 2017
Issue 134
AUG - SEPT 2016
Issue 133
JUN - JUL 2016
Issue 132
APR - MAY 2016
Issue 131
FEB - MAR 2016
Issue 130
DEC 2015 - JAN 2016
Issue 129
OCT - NOV 2015
Issue 128
AUG - SEPT 2015
Issue 127
JUN - JUL 2015
Issue 125
APR - MAY 2015
Issue 125
FEB - MAR 2015
Issue 124
DEC 2014 - JAN 2015
Issue 123
OCT - NOV 2014
Issue 122
AUG - SEPT 2014
Issue 121
JUN - JUL 2014
Issue 120
APR - MAY 2014
Issue 119
FEB - MAR 2014
Issue 118
DEC 2013 - JAN 2014
Issue 117
OCT - NOV 2013
Issue 116
AUG - SEPT 2013
Comments (1)
Write a Comment